Great :) I think, in this context, it makes sense to also link to the thread on the translators mailing list, where many of us have already been discussing the issue, and started to investigate options.
https://sourceforge.net/p/inkscape/mailman/inkscape-translator/thread/CAPOH7%3DZn3sWhZ%3D1DDB-1FUp%2BQUZzrLmyy7iOFiL1VcfY0maG9g%40mail.gmail.com/#msg35807172 Victor (who initiated the thread) has already written about his findings about Sphinx there, and he also linked to a list on github, where different documentation systems are listed (sorry, your latest email is still on my todo list, Victor). Elisa has mentioned the Booktype instance of flossmanualsfr, as far as I remember. Regards, Maren Am 29.04.2017 um 00:17 schrieb Martin Owens: > On Sat, 2017-04-29 at 00:01 +0200, Maren Hachmann wrote: >> Would it make sense to use gitlab's new subgroups feature for this? >> >> The inkscape-docs team could be a sub-team of Inkscape, that way. >> There >> are only 4 members as of now, so changing wouldn't be so difficult as >> it >> might be later on. > > Agreed. > > I've moved everything around and re-added the members to the group. > > Project is now: https://gitlab.com/inkscape/inkscape-docs/manuals > Group is now: https://gitlab.com/inkscape/inkscape-docs > > Best Regards, Martin Owens > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ Inkscape-docs mailing list Inkscape-docs@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/inkscape-docs
