> -----Original Message----- > From: Eric Wilhelm [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, November 17, 2006 1:19 PM > > I'm wondering if something like Inline::GenXS might be a > better name for > it. Most of the Inline::$foo modules allow you to inline the $foo > language.
I agree that having such a module would be great, and I agree that it probably shouldn't be called Inline::XS. Inline::XS indeed suggests that I'd be able to inline some XS code, but we already have that - it's Inline::C. In other namespaces like DBI::, Mason::, these kinds of things tend to go in namespaces like DBIx:: and MasonX::, so how about putting this in the InlineX:: namespace? -Ken
