Eric Wilhelm schrieb:
# from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
# on Friday 17 November 2006 02:29 pm:
InlineX::
Seconded. InlineX::XS
You try to pronounce that ;)
Fun aside, I agree that this should be a better choice. I'm not in a
hurry to release this - particularly so since Sisyphus is working on
Inline::C2XS with support for more of Inline's configuration.
Granted, Inline::XS actually gets used as a (sort of) drop-in for
Inline, but I'm not sure that is the ideal, and I think a second TLN is
appropriate here.
Yep, addressing Ken's point about Inline::C really being Inline::XS:
That was kind of my guiding for the namespace choice. It's working the
same as Inline::C, but outputs XS.
Well, I'll stop laboring that point. Inline::XS *is* misleading.
Steffen
