Hi Sisyphus, could you give the link where you discussed this on perlmonk? On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 8:10 PM, Sisyphus <sisyph...@optusnet.com.au> wrote:
> > ----- Original Message ----- From: "David Oswald" <daosw...@gmail.com> > To: <inline@perl.org> > Sent: Thursday, December 22, 2011 8:38 PM > Subject: Inline::CPP development version 0.33_003 uploaded to CPAN > > > > No additional progress on smoke test issues. I'm still uncertain >> where to go next in that regard; particularly with BrowserUk's issue. >> > > There's only one word to describe the output that BrowserUk got - and it's > not a word that's used in polite company. > > Ask him to give 0.33_003 a go. And if he gets the same output as he got > for _001, ask for a 'dir' output for the top level source directory, and > also for the contents of the generated top level makefile. > > I can't for the life of me imagine what has induced that "Running > Mkbootstrap for Inline::CPP ()" and ensuing crap to spew forth. > > We definitely need more information about that output if we're to get > anywhere with it. > Surely, there aren't any cpan-tester reports that produce anything like > that ? > > Cheers, > Rob > >
