Hi David, I've been following your threads about the great work you're doing in reviving Inline::CPP. I did some work on Inline::BC a few years ago.
IMHO I'm not sure that introducing a new module is the right way to proceed. You've already done so much work regarding compiler detection and its all encapsulated neatly in the one module. I think by allowing a different module to handle this, you loose a little control and may very well end up maintaining this module in addition to Inline::CPP. Cheers, Ron. On 24/03/12 6:55 AM, "David Oswald" <daosw...@gmail.com> wrote: > ExtUtils::.... seems like a good call. So good, in fact, that it led > me to discover ExtUtils::CppGuess from Steffen Mueller. Looks like > that might actually fit the bill nicely, eliminating the need to start > something new. > > Testing it on my Windows Vista and my Ubuntu Linux systems I find that > it provides the same defaults that I'm currently detecting in > Inline::CPP's version of "the wheel". I may drop it into > Inline::CPP's Makefile.PL and see how the smoke tests turn out for > another dev release. > > > > On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 3:26 PM, David Mertens <dcmertens.p...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> Either ExtUtils or Devel namespaces come to mind. I'll think more, but those >> are a start. >> >> David >> >> On Mar 23, 2012 4:49 PM, "David Oswald" <daosw...@gmail.com> wrote: > >
