On 01/16/2014 10:51 AM, Bradley Lowekamp wrote: > It's not clear from your(s) comments if you are in favor of using > remote modules for all new modules or not?
No. AFAIK remote modules are to be used when their maintainers intentionally want to distribute the module separately from upstream ITK. I don't think they should be part of the review process for contributions intended to go upstream. > Or if small new contribution like a single class should be added > as separate module or integrated into the appropriate existing module? It should be integrated in an appropriate existing module if it makes sense and otherwise used to create a new module. That decision should be part of the review process. In either case by putting the code right in the source tree for review then we get Gerrit and CDash@Home to test it. -Brad K _______________________________________________ Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Kitware offers ITK Training Courses, for more information visit: http://kitware.com/products/protraining.php Please keep messages on-topic and check the ITK FAQ at: http://www.itk.org/Wiki/ITK_FAQ Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://www.itk.org/mailman/listinfo/insight-developers
