> http://review.source.kitware.com/#/c/16579 > http://review.source.kitware.com/#/c/16578 > Incredibly, 16578 and 16579 seem to be circularly dependent.
Why do you say they're circularly dependent? It looks to me like 79 is based on 78... I'm not seeing the circularity. D _______________________________________________ Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Kitware offers ITK Training Courses, for more information visit: http://kitware.com/products/protraining.php Please keep messages on-topic and check the ITK FAQ at: http://www.itk.org/Wiki/ITK_FAQ Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/insight-developers
