UNIX admin <tripivceta at hotmail.com> writes: >> That's pretty useless if you want swap or intend to use live >> upgrade. > > swap would be on there. That's granted, one needs swap. > > s0: (s2 - s1) / s1: swap s2: whole disk, as usual. > > That's what I meant. No /usr, no /opt, no /var and definitely no > /export/home.
> If we go by the logic of your response, you yourself could easily > argue that the current scheme is useless because there is only /, swap > and /export/home, and no space for live upgrade. I think the assumption is that the liveupgrade setup would be N*<default layout>, in many cases > What I want to propose as an RFE/PSARC is that /export/home be done > away with as the default FS layout when installing, and instead > created as subdirectories inside of /. swap would stay. Anybody > wishing to slice up the disk for live upgrade could do it in exactly > the same way as with the current default (/, swap, /export/home). > Given the plan seems to be to go to ZFS, concerns about slicing things up seem rather moot (unless this desire would extend even into ZFS fs layout, in which case I'm not understanding *why*). -- Rich
