Bill Sommerfeld wrote: > On Wed, 2006-03-08 at 11:58, Peter Tribble wrote: >> Interesting. I tried on S10U1 and they built fine for me. As >> far as I can tell, anyway! > > not surprising since the new interfaces were introduced to allow zones > to be upgraded, which was a prerequisite for S10U1 being allowed to > escape.. >
Yes, building on S10U1 does work at the moment because, as Bill notes, the same interfaces went in there. We won't guarantee that'll be true for future dependencies that might be introduced. Dave
