Vasiliy wrote:
>> I'm not seeing how this is any different than the
>> basic proposal outline 
>> that James presented to start this discussion.  It
> 
> Ok let me explain the difference:
> 
> It different in terms of we are not introducing softwaer domanins as a new 
> concept of  software management but allowing user do his local installation 
> without obligation from us to maintain it. All mainanance for user-installed 
> packages are his own problem, our commitment is to maintain system 
> consistency. And we just substituting current tar-balling practice with 
> something bit better, supporting users playing with software - which they 
> already doing. 
> 
> Software domain sounds much more complicated then just - user installing some 
> new software for evaluation. For software domain etc if we saying that we 
> support them we will have to provide good isolation levev which on my opinion 
> same as we have already for zones and was introduced in zones partially for 
> the reason to install and use different software isolated.
> 
> So I think that scale of this are very different. As well as inplementation 
> effort.
> 

Vasya, it sounds like you feel that the term "software domain" is
not appropriate for this proposal and should
be reserved for projects which provide true process and file
isolation (like Zones).  I would be happy to change the terminology
I use to describe the "software home" where users install their
user-based software, if that would alleviate your concerns.

>> doesn't answer any of 
>> my concerns about presenting a more comprehensive
>> view of the system 
>> software, though.
> 
> The point is that we separate two different things - user level nstallation 
> and software domain, and target first one with minor changes to existing 
> solutions and target another one using alredy existing solutions zones.
> 
> So we are not presenting any more comprehensive view of the system software, 
> avoiding introduction of new comlexity dimentions.

This is a major point of this proposal - that we avoid those dimensions you
speak of.

-jhf-

Reply via email to