On 2009-01-21 13:57, Joe Touch wrote:
...
> If the purpose of the WG is experiments, then this work clearly belongs
> back on the IRTF, which is not the goal AFAICT (I bring this up only to
> reinforce David's view that experiments are out of scope).
I'm guessing that Jari's comment is because of the notion that documents
published as Experimental RFCs should include (unless it's totally
obvious) some discussion of how their success or failure will be
evaluated. That doesn't IMHO mean that the WG is actually responsible
for the experiment.
It's difficult in this case because the goal is to make the Internet
scale much bigger than it is today, and that would be quite an
experiment ;-)
Brian
_______________________________________________
Int-area mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
