David Meyer wrote:
[...] If the consenus is do such a draft (assuming there is somewhere to "do a draft"), then I assume we (the community) will do so. Otherwise, we will not. [...]
Of course. And my observations are input to such consensus making. Having said this, and given that current consensus holds that we won't work on address allocation guidelines, I do support the proposed LISP working group. It would have a potential to yield valuable input for the ongoing research efforts on routing scalability -- at least in terms of performance measurements and gained implementation experience. An open question, though, is how and by whom the results from a LISP working group, and from related engineering and research efforts elsewhere, would eventually be evaluated, and how any mitigating effect on routing scalability would be measured. - Christian _______________________________________________ Int-area mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
