Hi Joe, I wonder whether you want to tell me the following truth by the example that you gave: no matter whatever improvements we had done with this draft, those persons who dislike it by the light of nature would dislike it in the end.
Best regards, Xiaohu Here's the issue - I still do not think that this document should be a WG doc, and I frankly don't think it's constructive for you to try to address each flaw as it is raised. Consider the following: A- you go to a restaurant and eat dinner B - I ask you if you like it, and you say "no" C- I ask why, and you say "it was too salty" Now, does that mean that if the cook corrects the salt level that you would now like the food? Probably not. The same is true here. I've given reasons I don't think it should be a WG doc. IF it is accepted as a WG doc, I might decide how much resources I want to devote to trying to address its deficiencies. Joe
_______________________________________________ Int-area mailing list Int-area@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
