On 5/24/2016 7:01 PM, Xuxiaohu wrote: > [Xiaohu] Trying to address each flaw as it is raised is not what we IETF > attendees are expected to do for any draft in the IETF?
Yes, addressing flaws is what you're supposed to do - in a draft update (which hasn't happened in the year since they were raised). However, you ignored the other issues that come up when this doc is considered for WG adoption - do we need it? You haven't made that case. If this were critical to Softwires, they wouldn't have shut down before they had a solution. You already note that this approach is more limited in use than the more general solutions that are already deployed. Joe _______________________________________________ Int-area mailing list Int-area@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
