Joe,

On 7/19/2017 12:41 AM, Olivier Bonaventure wrote:
- IMO, TCP always needs to be able to fall back (which should be
true now)

This is not a concern with the proposed design
Prove that is true if/when TCP-AO is enabled.

I don't think that TCP-AO is a use case for the proposed converters.

You don't get to decide that. If you use TCP, then TCP-AO could be
enabled on the client.

The converter is not intended to be used for all TCP connections. In the draft we explain how an MPTCP endpoint can bypass the converter if the destination server supports MPTCP. For TCP-AO, my recommendation would be that the default policy of the client would be to never use the converter if TCP-AO is requested by the application.


Olivier

--

------------------------------
DISCLAIMER.
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the individual named. If you are not the named addressee you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system. If you are not the intended recipient you are notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited.

_______________________________________________
Int-area mailing list
Int-area@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area

Reply via email to