Well, it's not crazy to bring it to v6ops. I sent the authors to int-area IIRC, but we could look at it in the IETF 104 timeframe and in email in between time. It won't make the agenda for 103 - we're full up.
> On Oct 24, 2018, at 5:13 AM, Suresh Krishnan <sur...@kaloom.com> wrote: > > I did think of it, but the draft is also expected to work with IPv4 and that > made me reconsider (In fact one of my solicited reviews for the previous > version of this draft was from Fred Baker). Fred/Ron, do you think this draft > can fit in v6ops? If so, I will send the authors your way. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- The fact that there is a highway to hell and a stairway to heaven is an interesting comment on projected traffic volume...
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
_______________________________________________ Int-area mailing list Int-area@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
