This sounds to me as NEP is not making benefits at all, and then someone used it :-)
And the funny thing when people said it is fine to take something from the market and don't pay :D Please lets close this discussion for now as it has no benefits and waste time because of the comments that keeps saying "it will not work" and "no", because I cannot guarantee for you something I didn't implement. Hope to find somewhere else where we can discuss technically and implement and say clear and accurate answers. Thanks, Khaled Omar -----Original Message----- From: Mikael Abrahamsson <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, September 17, 2020 5:57 PM To: Khaled Omar <[email protected]> Cc: int-area <[email protected]> Subject: RE: [Int-area] IPv10 draft (was Re: FW: [v6ops] v6ops - New Meeting Session Request for IETF 109 - IPv10) On Thu, 17 Sep 2020, Khaled Omar wrote: > Why people don't want to participate in this work? Because we know it won't work. It's waste of time. You do not understand 95% of the problem space. You need to sit down, learn DNS, Socket interfaces, packet on the wire (v4/v6) what routers do, and then you need to take all of that and apply your IPv10 proposal to it and go into all the details. If you did, you'd understand why it doesn't work. You've wasted hundreds of hours of our time already, now go do the hard work. People here won't do it for you. It's your idea, spend the time to turn it into somehing more concrete. -- Mikael Abrahamsson email: [email protected] _______________________________________________ Int-area mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
