Because one thing I’m trying to do, to solve an important issue, we cannot keep watching the division and do nothing.
Again, one of my proposals was taken without noticing, and some people were saying same as you now, the issue is that (and I’m sorry to say this) you don’t say the truth, even there is a pressure behind your back, better for you to avoid saying the opposite of what is inside you rather than saying what you say now. Believe me, working on IPv10 draft will bring benefit for all, for the Internet, users, network engineers, and IETFers just we some organized fashion. Khaled Omar From: Ted Lemon <[email protected]> Sent: Saturday, September 19, 2020 2:36 PM To: Khaled Omar <[email protected]> Cc: Per Øyvind Heldal <[email protected]>; [email protected] Subject: Re: [Int-area] IPv10 draft (was Re: FW: [v6ops] v6ops - New Meeting Session Request for IETF 109 - IPv10) On Sep 19, 2020, at 8:10 AM, Khaled Omar <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: I can keep trying as long as walking on the right road. Why do you think you are walking the right road? Sometimes it’s true that a person can be a voice in the wilderness crying out a truth that others refuse to see, it’s true. But another explanation for this phenomenon is that what you are saying isn’t true, and that’s why nobody believes you. Why are you coming to the IETF with this? It’s because this is where the people are who understand the Internet. And yet we are saying “no” to your proposal, over and over again. Why do you trust us enough to come to us with your proposal, but not enough to listen to us when we tell you that it is not solving a problem that we think needs to be solved?
_______________________________________________ Int-area mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
