I think Bernard's point is that PPP bridging is defined (RFC 3518). That is, PPP links can be bridged together. They cannot be bridged with Ethernet links.
Whether it's wired or wireless depends on whatever the physical media under PPP is. So for example, if someone were to do RFC3518 with PPPoE and if PPPoE is able to work over 802.11 (offhand I don't know if it does), then you'd have bridged PPP over wireless. -Dave > -----Original Message----- > From: Alexandru Petrescu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, August 07, 2006 3:22 PM > To: Bernard Aboba > Cc: NetLMM WG; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [Int-area] Re: [netlmm] IPv6 addressing model, per-MN > subnetprefix, and broadcast domain > > Bernard Aboba wrote: > >> I'd add that if the wireless nature of MN-to-AR interface is > >> point-to-point (not Ethernet) then we do talk about one prefix > >> valid on that point-to-point link, and about one MN per one prefix; > >> in my understanding. > > > > PPP can support bridging and Ethernet bridges can assign different > > VLANs per port. So the scope of the broadcast domain really is > > orthogonal to the link type. > > Wirelessly? Do we have any bridged PPP over wireless access, or any VLAN > over wireless access? > > Alex > > _______________________________________________ > Int-area mailing list > [email protected] > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area _______________________________________________ Int-area mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
