I think following up with the Transport area is a good idea. In particular, I've always thought that the monami6 work overlaps with NSIS. Both protocols transport packet filters that affect the processing of packets.
I have also wondered how much of monami6 could be accomplished with the use of multiple home addresses. After all, I would expect each interface to have its own home address and applications would need to bind themselves to the right home address to function properly over a given link type. In other words, it is important to solve this problem even in the absence of a mobility management protocol. -Pete Thomas Narten wrote: > Some quick thoughts. > > 1) This is a generic problem that is not specific to mobile IP. I > think it would (generally) be a mistake to adopt approaches that > are tightly coupled to the MIP protocols. > > 2) The overall topic of flow balancing has been discussed extensively > over a long period of time in the transport community. It is a very > hard problem, and seemingly simple approaches tend to come with a > number of limitations/disadvantages. Please extend this call for > input/participation to the TSV community (tsvwg, perhaps?). > > Thomas > > _______________________________________________ > Int-area mailing list > [email protected] > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area _______________________________________________ Int-area mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
