> I think there is some baggage with the term Sub-IP, so I wouldn't > recommend using this term.
Clearly there is also baggage with the terms L3a/b/c, and L2.5 does not capture it because there is not any one clearly defined layer that occurs between L3 and L2. What would your suggestion would be? Fred [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ Int-area mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
