> sub-IP is in fact what the IETF, which has little understanding of > things below the internet layer, calls it. If we take the > caveat that > the extreme generality of the term is a demonstration of our lack of > competence in the area, it's probably fine.
Well said. > personally, I see a huge difference between the thing that > interprets > ones and zeroes coming off a medium into messages that can be > understood (L2) and anything that uses concatenated L2 links to > communicate among a selection of potentially non-neighboring systems > (L3). Since I am actually able to distinguish them, I personally > prefer to do so. That too. Thanks - Fred [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ Int-area mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
