On Oct 1, 2007, at 12:40 AM, Joe Touch wrote:
MUST is the directive to implementers of this specification, and is
appropriate (I didn't check, but presumably it is paired with "MUST be
ignored on receipt").
I did look for that, didn't recall seeing it (or any other error
handling, etc.., for that matter).
Future specifications can set it to a different value and 'not
ignore' it.
SHOULD would allow implementers to change the value under the current
spec, which would render the field useless to future specs.
Yeah, you're right, I should have know that..
Thanks for the clue!
-danny
_______________________________________________
Int-area mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
