Iljitsch, >> Even the RRG work is taking the view that any proposed new architecture >> has to provide value to and connectivity with folks who have IPv4, if it >> is going to be adopted. > > "Has"? If we stumble upon the perfect solution that works with IPv6 > but not with IPv4 I don't think that solution will be ignored. But on > the other hand, I don't think everyone will call it a day and go home > at that point, either.
I think the key issue the RRG has to look at is incremental deployability. Right now that means supporting IPv4. Some years from now it might well not. Eliot _______________________________________________ Int-area mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
