On Mon, 20 Feb 2017 15:08:43 +0100 Hans de Goede <hdego...@redhat.com> wrote:
> For v3 VBTs we should call MIPI_SEQ_TEAR_OFF before > MIPI_SEQ_DISPLAY_OFF, for non v3 VBTs this is a nop. Isn't this only for command mode? Or is there conflicting information on this? > > Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdego...@redhat.com> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi.c | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi.c > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi.c > index 1914311..90263d6 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi.c > @@ -772,6 +772,7 @@ static void intel_dsi_post_disable(struct intel_encoder > *encoder, > * XXX spec specifies SHUTDOWN before MIPI_SEQ_DISPLAY_OFF for > * v3 VBTs, but not for v2 VBTs? > */ > + intel_dsi_exec_vbt_sequence(intel_dsi, MIPI_SEQ_TEAR_OFF); > intel_dsi_exec_vbt_sequence(intel_dsi, MIPI_SEQ_DISPLAY_OFF); > > /* Transition to LP-00 */ -- -- Bob Paauwe bob.j.paa...@intel.com IOTG / PED Software Organization Intel Corp. Folsom, CA (916) 356-6193 _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
