Hi,
On 24-02-17 18:02, Bob Paauwe wrote:
On Mon, 20 Feb 2017 15:08:43 +0100
Hans de Goede <hdego...@redhat.com> wrote:
For v3 VBTs we should call MIPI_SEQ_TEAR_OFF before
MIPI_SEQ_DISPLAY_OFF, for non v3 VBTs this is a nop.
Isn't this only for command mode? Or is there conflicting information
on this?
In my (limited) set of test hardware vidmode panel VBTs simply
do not define a MIPI_SEQ_TEAR_ON/OFF sequence. But it would probably
be a good idea to guard this with a "if (is_cmd_mode(intel_dsi))"
assuming we only want this for commandmode, which I think we do,
but it would be good to have this confirmed.
I'll add the guard when I send out a v2 after we've clarified
some of the other review questions.
Regards,
Hans
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdego...@redhat.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi.c
index 1914311..90263d6 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dsi.c
@@ -772,6 +772,7 @@ static void intel_dsi_post_disable(struct intel_encoder
*encoder,
* XXX spec specifies SHUTDOWN before MIPI_SEQ_DISPLAY_OFF for
* v3 VBTs, but not for v2 VBTs?
*/
+ intel_dsi_exec_vbt_sequence(intel_dsi, MIPI_SEQ_TEAR_OFF);
intel_dsi_exec_vbt_sequence(intel_dsi, MIPI_SEQ_DISPLAY_OFF);
/* Transition to LP-00 */
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
