From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com>
To untangle the mess that is intel_ddi_post_disable() move the the bits
needed by FDI into intel_ddi_fdi_post_disable(). This way we can stop
worrying about FDI in intel_ddi_post_disable().
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nik...@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c
index e4d1d934231b..7187aea75697 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c
@@ -2349,7 +2349,8 @@ void intel_ddi_fdi_post_disable(struct intel_encoder
*encoder,
val &= ~FDI_RX_ENABLE;
I915_WRITE(FDI_RX_CTL(PIPE_A), val);
- intel_ddi_post_disable(encoder, old_crtc_state, old_conn_state);
+ intel_disable_ddi_buf(encoder);
+ intel_ddi_clk_disable(encoder);
val = I915_READ(FDI_RX_MISC(PIPE_A));
val &= ~(FDI_RX_PWRDN_LANE1_MASK | FDI_RX_PWRDN_LANE0_MASK);
--
2.13.6
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
