Thanks! Looks good to me. -----Original Message----- From: Chris Wilson [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, November 15, 2017 3:17 PM To: [email protected] Cc: Chris Wilson <[email protected]>; Joonas Lahtinen <[email protected]>; Wang, Zhi A <[email protected]>; Ville Syrjälä <[email protected]> Subject: [PATCH v2] drm/i915: Initialise entry in intel_ppat_get() for older compilers
gcc-4.7.3 is confused by the guards inside intel_ppat_get() and reports: drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c: In function ‘intel_ppat_get’: drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c:3044:27: warning: ‘entry’ may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized] Forgive the compiler this once, and rearrange the code so that entry is always initialised. v2: Flavour with a bit of NULL (instead of ERR_PTR(-ENOSPC). Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <[email protected]> Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <[email protected]> Cc: Zhi Wang <[email protected]> Cc: Ville Syrjälä <[email protected]> --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c index 3c3a699436c9..f92a39fc511c 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c @@ -3076,7 +3076,7 @@ const struct intel_ppat_entry * intel_ppat_get(struct drm_i915_private *i915, u8 value) { struct intel_ppat *ppat = &i915->ppat; - struct intel_ppat_entry *entry; + struct intel_ppat_entry *entry = NULL; unsigned int scanned, best_score; int i; @@ -3099,7 +3099,7 @@ intel_ppat_get(struct drm_i915_private *i915, u8 value) } if (scanned == ppat->max_entries) { - if (!best_score) + if (!entry) return ERR_PTR(-ENOSPC); kref_get(&entry->ref); -- 2.15.0 _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list [email protected] https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
