Hi 2012/11/1 Daniel Vetter <dan...@ffwll.ch>: > On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 06:12:26PM -0200, Paulo Zanoni wrote: >> From: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zan...@intel.com> >> >> There is only one PCH transcoder, so it's always _FDI_RXA_CTL. Using >> "pipe" here is wrong. >> >> While at it, also reuse the rx_ctl_val variable created in the >> previous commit. >> >> Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zan...@intel.com> >> --- >> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c | 24 ++++++++---------------- >> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c >> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c >> index 39a53b4..c397da3 100644 >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c >> @@ -153,8 +153,7 @@ void hsw_fdi_link_train(struct drm_crtc *crtc) >> struct drm_device *dev = crtc->dev; >> struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private; >> struct intel_crtc *intel_crtc = to_intel_crtc(crtc); >> - int pipe = intel_crtc->pipe; >> - u32 reg, temp, i, rx_ctl_val; >> + u32 temp, i, rx_ctl_val; >> >> /* Set the FDI_RX_MISC pwrdn lanes and the 2 workarounds listed at the >> * mode set "sequence for CRT port" document: >> @@ -199,17 +198,10 @@ void hsw_fdi_link_train(struct drm_crtc *crtc) >> >> udelay(600); >> >> - /* Enable CPU FDI Receiver with auto-training */ >> - reg = FDI_RX_CTL(pipe); >> - I915_WRITE(reg, >> - I915_READ(reg) | >> - FDI_LINK_TRAIN_AUTO | >> - FDI_RX_ENABLE | >> - FDI_LINK_TRAIN_PATTERN_1_CPT | > > The LINK_TRAIN_PAT1 here seems to disappear. Is that simply because when > using auto training, we may not set this? If so, please mention that in > the commit message. All the other flags are set, safe for ... >> - FDI_RX_ENHANCE_FRAME_ENABLE | >> - FDI_PORT_WIDTH_2X_LPT | > > ... dropping the 2X_LPT mode here will blow up on low-res, see my comment > in the previous patch.
It would blow up if everything else was actually working... If you take a look at intel_ddi_enable_pipe_func, you will see that before my series it sets the width to 1x where the other pieces of our code set to 2x, which is just wrong. On my series, as I change the functions I change them to use the "correct width", and after patch 8 we do have the "correct width" being set, but VGA really doesn't work yet because of the other thousand problems it has: you can't notice the difference in patch 8 because you need all the other future fixes. So I really think we should just assume VGA is a total failure until before the very last patch :) > -Daniel > >> - FDI_RX_PLL_ENABLE); >> - POSTING_READ(reg); >> + /* Enable PCH FDI Receiver with auto-training */ >> + rx_ctl_val |= FDI_RX_ENABLE | FDI_LINK_TRAIN_AUTO; >> + I915_WRITE(_FDI_RXA_CTL, rx_ctl_val); >> + POSTING_READ(_FDI_RXA_CTL); >> udelay(100); >> >> temp = I915_READ(DP_TP_STATUS(PORT_E)); >> @@ -231,9 +223,9 @@ void hsw_fdi_link_train(struct drm_crtc *crtc) >> I915_WRITE(DP_TP_CTL(PORT_E), >> I915_READ(DP_TP_CTL(PORT_E)) & >> ~DP_TP_CTL_ENABLE); >> - I915_WRITE(FDI_RX_CTL(pipe), >> - I915_READ(FDI_RX_CTL(pipe)) & >> - ~FDI_RX_PLL_ENABLE); >> + >> + rx_ctl_val &= ~FDI_RX_PLL_ENABLE; >> + I915_WRITE(_FDI_RXA_CTL, rx_ctl_val); >> continue; >> } >> } >> -- >> 1.7.11.4 >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Intel-gfx mailing list >> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org >> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx > > -- > Daniel Vetter > Software Engineer, Intel Corporation > +41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch -- Paulo Zanoni _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
