On Wed, Apr 03, 2019 at 04:35:35PM -0700, José Roberto de Souza wrote:
> Even when driver is reloaded and hits this scenario the PSR mutex
> should be initialized, otherwise reading PSR debugfs status will
> execute mutex_lock() over a mutex that was not initialized.
>
> Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandi...@intel.com>
> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.v...@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.so...@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c | 1 -
> 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c
> index c80bb3003a7d..a84da931c3be 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c
> @@ -1227,7 +1227,6 @@ void intel_psr_init(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> if (val) {
> DRM_DEBUG_KMS("PSR interruption error set\n");
> dev_priv->psr.sink_not_reliable = true;
> - return;
There are other returns above and if debugfs hits this case maybe it
is worth to move the mutex initialization up instead?
> }
>
> /* Set link_standby x link_off defaults */
> --
> 2.21.0
>
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
