On Fri, Jul 12, 2019 at 06:09:36PM -0700, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
> From: Tomasz Lis <tomasz....@intel.com>
>
> The MOCS table is published as part of bspec, and versioned. Entries
> are supposed to never be modified, but new ones can be added. Adding
> entries increases table version. The patch includes version 1 entries.
>
> Two of the 3 legacy entries used for gen9 are no longer expected to work.
> Although we are changing the gen11 table, those changes are supposed to
> be backward compatible since we are only touching previously undefined
> entries.
>
> Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahti...@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuopp...@intel.com>
> Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospu...@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Tomasz Lis <tomasz....@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demar...@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_mocs.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_mocs.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_mocs.c
> index 290a5e9b90b9..259e7bec0a63 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_mocs.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_mocs.c
> @@ -62,6 +62,10 @@ struct drm_i915_mocs_table {
> #define GEN11_NUM_MOCS_ENTRIES 64 /* 63-64 are reserved, but
> configured. */
>
> /* (e)LLC caching options */
> +/*
> + * Note: LE_0_PAGETABLE works only up to Gen11; for newer gens it means
> + * the same as LE_UC
> + */
> #define LE_0_PAGETABLE _LE_CACHEABILITY(0)
> #define LE_1_UC _LE_CACHEABILITY(1)
> #define LE_2_WT _LE_CACHEABILITY(2)
> @@ -100,8 +104,9 @@ struct drm_i915_mocs_table {
> * of bspec.
> *
> * Entries not part of the following tables are undefined as far as
> - * userspace is concerned and shouldn't be relied upon. For the time
> - * being they will be initialized to PTE.
> + * userspace is concerned and shouldn't be relied upon. For Gen < 12
> + * they will be initialized to PTE. Gen >= 12 onwards don't have a setting
> for
> + * PTE. We use the same value, but that actually means Uncached.
> *
> * The last two entries are reserved by the hardware. For ICL+ they
> * should be initialized according to bspec and never used, for older
> @@ -137,11 +142,13 @@ static const struct drm_i915_mocs_entry
> broxton_mocs_table[] = {
> };
>
> #define GEN11_MOCS_ENTRIES \
> - /* Base - Uncached (Deprecated) */ \
> + /* Gen11: Base - Uncached (Deprecated) */ \
> + /* Gen12+: Base - Error (Reserved for Non-Use) */ \
> MOCS_ENTRY(I915_MOCS_UNCACHED, \
> LE_1_UC | LE_TC_1_LLC, \
> L3_1_UC), \
> /* Base - L3 + LeCC:PAT (Deprecated) */ \
> + /* Gen12+: Base - Reserved */ \
> MOCS_ENTRY(I915_MOCS_PTE, \
> LE_0_PAGETABLE | LE_TC_1_LLC, \
> L3_3_WB), \
> @@ -233,6 +240,18 @@ static const struct drm_i915_mocs_entry
> broxton_mocs_table[] = {
> MOCS_ENTRY(23, \
> LE_3_WB | LE_TC_1_LLC | LE_LRUM(3) | LE_RSC(1) | LE_SCC(7), \
> L3_3_WB), \
> + /* Gen12+: HW Reserved - HDC:L1 + L3 + LLC */ \
Why is this marked as reserved? From the looks of things 48-61 should
just be normal entries that userspace can select to get HDC L1$. And
looks like icl already has that stuff. So someone should probably figure
out if Mesa/etc. can make use of the HDC L1$, and if so we should add
the relevant MOCS entries for icl as well.
> + MOCS_ENTRY(48, \
> + LE_3_WB | LE_TC_1_LLC | LE_LRUM(3), \
> + L3_3_WB), \
> + /* Gen12+: HW Reserved - HW Special Case (CCS) */ \
> + MOCS_ENTRY(60, \
> + LE_3_WB | LE_TC_1_LLC | LE_LRUM(3), \
> + L3_1_UC), \
> + /* Gen12+: HW Reserved - HW Special Case (Displayable) */ \
> + MOCS_ENTRY(61, \
> + LE_1_UC | LE_TC_1_LLC | LE_SCF(1), \
> + L3_3_WB), \
> /* HW Reserved - SW program but never use */ \
> MOCS_ENTRY(62, \
> LE_3_WB | LE_TC_1_LLC | LE_LRUM(3), \
> --
> 2.21.0
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
