Make sure we don't block while setting up the stress case before the reset by only submitting less batches than would fill the ring.
References: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111379 Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk> --- tests/i915/gem_eio.c | 13 +++++++++---- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/tests/i915/gem_eio.c b/tests/i915/gem_eio.c index dcbcefa97..9b086a039 100644 --- a/tests/i915/gem_eio.c +++ b/tests/i915/gem_eio.c @@ -734,6 +734,11 @@ static void reset_stress(int fd, uint32_t ctx0, .flags = engine, }; igt_stats_t stats; + int max; + + max = gem_measure_ring_inflight(fd, engine, 0); + max = max / 2 - 1; /* assume !execlists and a shared ring */ + igt_require(max > 0); gem_write(fd, obj.handle, 0, &bbe, sizeof(bbe)); @@ -755,11 +760,11 @@ static void reset_stress(int fd, uint32_t ctx0, hang = spin_sync(fd, ctx0, engine); execbuf.rsvd1 = ctx; - for (i = 0; i < 10; i++) + for (i = 0; i < max; i++) gem_execbuf(fd, &execbuf); execbuf.rsvd1 = ctx0; - for (i = 0; i < 10; i++) + for (i = 0; i < max; i++) gem_execbuf(fd, &execbuf); /* Wedge after a small delay. */ @@ -777,11 +782,11 @@ static void reset_stress(int fd, uint32_t ctx0, * both contexts. */ execbuf.rsvd1 = ctx; - for (i = 0; i < 5; i++) + for (i = 0; i < max; i++) gem_execbuf(fd, &execbuf); execbuf.rsvd1 = ctx0; - for (i = 0; i < 5; i++) + for (i = 0; i < max; i++) gem_execbuf(fd, &execbuf); gem_sync(fd, obj.handle); -- 2.23.0.rc1 _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
