Quoting Chris Wilson (2019-09-25 12:29:40) > Quoting Chris Wilson (2019-09-25 12:24:08) > > Quoting Chris Wilson (2019-09-25 12:17:14) > > > Quoting Tvrtko Ursulin (2019-09-25 11:57:53) > > > > > > > > I am still slightly uneasy about having requests, which I see as a GEM > > > > concept, be retired from GT, but okay, it's not the most important > > > > issue > > > > at the moment. > > > > > > requests are not a GEM concept, they belong in sched/ :) > > > > Overall though, the compartmentalisation is intel_gt based. Our > > timelines and their powermanagement is associated with the gt, so that's > > where it feels necessary to provide the background cleanup. If we drop > > the timeline->gt, then I think it's time for a new home? > > Actually would a simple s//intel_gt_retire_timelines()/ make it more > palatable?
Or even just intel_gt_retire() -Chris _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
