On 25/09/2019 12:33, Chris Wilson wrote:
Quoting Chris Wilson (2019-09-25 12:29:40)
Quoting Chris Wilson (2019-09-25 12:24:08)
Quoting Chris Wilson (2019-09-25 12:17:14)
Quoting Tvrtko Ursulin (2019-09-25 11:57:53)
I am still slightly uneasy about having requests, which I see as a GEM
concept, be retired from GT, but okay, it's not the most important issue
at the moment.
requests are not a GEM concept, they belong in sched/ :)
Overall though, the compartmentalisation is intel_gt based. Our
timelines and their powermanagement is associated with the gt, so that's
where it feels necessary to provide the background cleanup. If we drop
the timeline->gt, then I think it's time for a new home?
Actually would a simple s//intel_gt_retire_timelines()/ make it more
palatable?
Or even just intel_gt_retire()
This bit is fine as it is. As we have both pointed out there is natural
and unavoidable intertwining between GEM and GT and that's completely
natural. As long as we have clear APIs between the two (so those helpers
I was suggesting) I am happy.
Regards,
Tvrtko
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
