If we don't use the return value of a mmio read our coding style is to
use the POSTING_READ macro. This avoids cluttering the mmio traces.

While at it add the missing posting read in the lcpll enable function
that Paulo spotted.

v2: Drop the _NOTRACE changes, tracing such wait_for loops in the modeset
code might actually be rather useful!

Cc: Paulo Zanoni <przan...@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vet...@ffwll.ch>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
index 7a40427..937fc5a6 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
@@ -6036,13 +6036,14 @@ void hsw_restore_lcpll(struct drm_i915_private 
*dev_priv)
        if (val & LCPLL_POWER_DOWN_ALLOW) {
                val &= ~LCPLL_POWER_DOWN_ALLOW;
                I915_WRITE(LCPLL_CTL, val);
+               POSTING_READ(LCPLL_CTL);
        }
 
        val = I915_READ(D_COMP);
        val |= D_COMP_COMP_FORCE;
        val &= ~D_COMP_COMP_DISABLE;
        I915_WRITE(D_COMP, val);
-       I915_READ(D_COMP);
+       POSTING_READ(D_COMP);
 
        val = I915_READ(LCPLL_CTL);
        val &= ~LCPLL_PLL_DISABLE;
-- 
1.8.4.rc3

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to