On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 06:49:31PM -0300, Paulo Zanoni wrote: > 2013/8/21 Daniel Vetter <daniel.vet...@ffwll.ch>: > > If we don't use the return value of a mmio read our coding style is to > > use the POSTING_READ macro. This avoids cluttering the mmio traces. > > > > While at it add the missing posting read in the lcpll enable function > > that Paulo spotted. > > > > v2: Drop the _NOTRACE changes, tracing such wait_for loops in the modeset > > code might actually be rather useful! > > > > Cc: Paulo Zanoni <przan...@gmail.com> > > Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vet...@ffwll.ch> > > Reviewed-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zan...@intel.com>
Queued for -next, thanks for the review. -Daniel -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation +41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
