On Fri, 2021-02-12 at 20:35 +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 12, 2021 at 10:22:01AM -0800, José Roberto de Souza wrote:
> > Found a system were firmware/BIOS left the plane_res_b and plane_res_l
> > set with non-zero values for disable planes.
>
> It pretty much happens always since the reset value is not zero.
> IIRC we made the state chcker pedantic enough to complain about
> that, so we need to clean it up.
Are you planning to fix it soon?
If not I can do it but will need a couple more of hints of what you
thinking to do.
We will need this fixed soon otherwise this system will block CI
testing in this platform.
>
> > As the planes are disabled i915 will not even try to sanitize it so
> > here returning earlier if both skl_wm_levels being compared are
> > disabled, if that is true no need to check the other fields as HW
> > will ignore it.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.so...@intel.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c | 2 ++
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> > index 8cc67f9c4e58..c630dc10c34b 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> > @@ -5633,6 +5633,8 @@ void skl_write_cursor_wm(struct intel_plane *plane,
> > bool skl_wm_level_equals(const struct skl_wm_level *l1,
> > const struct skl_wm_level *l2)
> > {
> > + if (l1->plane_en == false && l2->plane_en == false)
> > + return true;
> > return l1->plane_en == l2->plane_en &&
> > l1->ignore_lines == l2->ignore_lines &&
> > l1->plane_res_l == l2->plane_res_l &&
> > --
> > 2.30.1
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Intel-gfx mailing list
> > Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
>
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
