On Tue, Jun 22, 2021 at 02:22:09PM -0700, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
> We should no longer increment level 0 by 1usec when we have 16Gb DIMMs.
> Instead spec says to add 3usec (as opposed to 2) to each valid level
> when punit replies 0 to level 0.
> 
> So set wm_lv_0_adjust_needed to false for DISPLAY_VER() >= 12 and set
> the proper adjustement value when handling WaWmMemoryReadLatency.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demar...@intel.com>

Reviewed-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.ro...@intel.com>

> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dram.c |  3 +--
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c   | 13 +++++++------
>  2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dram.c 
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dram.c
> index 50fdea84ba70..879b0f007be3 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dram.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dram.c
> @@ -484,8 +484,7 @@ static int gen11_get_dram_info(struct drm_i915_private 
> *i915)
>  
>  static int gen12_get_dram_info(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
>  {
> -     /* Always needed for GEN12+ */
> -     i915->dram_info.wm_lv_0_adjust_needed = true;
> +     i915->dram_info.wm_lv_0_adjust_needed = false;
>  
>       return icl_pcode_read_mem_global_info(i915);
>  }
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> index ef8d9b2284b3..be2931d54b95 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> @@ -2911,18 +2911,20 @@ static void intel_read_wm_latency(struct 
> drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
>               }
>  
>               /*
> -              * WaWmMemoryReadLatency:skl+,glk
> +              * WaWmMemoryReadLatency
>                *
>                * punit doesn't take into account the read latency so we need
> -              * to add 2us to the various latency levels we retrieve from the
> -              * punit when level 0 response data us 0us.
> +              * to add proper adjustement to each valid level we retrieve
> +              * from the punit when level 0 response data is 0us.
>                */
>               if (wm[0] == 0) {
> -                     wm[0] += 2;
> +                     u8 adjust = DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 12 ? 3 : 2;
> +
> +                     wm[0] += adjust;
>                       for (level = 1; level <= max_level; level++) {
>                               if (wm[level] == 0)
>                                       break;
> -                             wm[level] += 2;
> +                             wm[level] += adjust;
>                       }
>               }
>  
> @@ -2934,7 +2936,6 @@ static void intel_read_wm_latency(struct 
> drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
>                */
>               if (dev_priv->dram_info.wm_lv_0_adjust_needed)
>                       wm[0] += 1;
> -
>       } else if (IS_HASWELL(dev_priv) || IS_BROADWELL(dev_priv)) {
>               u64 sskpd = intel_uncore_read64(uncore, MCH_SSKPD);
>  
> -- 
> 2.31.1
> 

-- 
Matt Roper
Graphics Software Engineer
VTT-OSGC Platform Enablement
Intel Corporation
(916) 356-2795
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to