On Tue, Jun 22, 2021 at 04:28:14PM -0700, Matt Roper wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 22, 2021 at 02:22:09PM -0700, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
> > We should no longer increment level 0 by 1usec when we have 16Gb DIMMs.
> > Instead spec says to add 3usec (as opposed to 2) to each valid level
> > when punit replies 0 to level 0.
> > 
> > So set wm_lv_0_adjust_needed to false for DISPLAY_VER() >= 12 and set
> > the proper adjustement value when handling WaWmMemoryReadLatency.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demar...@intel.com>
> 
> Reviewed-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.ro...@intel.com>

Might also be worth adding

Bspec: 49326, 4381

to the commit message while applying.

> 
> > ---
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dram.c |  3 +--
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c   | 13 +++++++------
> >  2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dram.c 
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dram.c
> > index 50fdea84ba70..879b0f007be3 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dram.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dram.c
> > @@ -484,8 +484,7 @@ static int gen11_get_dram_info(struct drm_i915_private 
> > *i915)
> >  
> >  static int gen12_get_dram_info(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
> >  {
> > -   /* Always needed for GEN12+ */
> > -   i915->dram_info.wm_lv_0_adjust_needed = true;
> > +   i915->dram_info.wm_lv_0_adjust_needed = false;
> >  
> >     return icl_pcode_read_mem_global_info(i915);
> >  }
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c 
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> > index ef8d9b2284b3..be2931d54b95 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> > @@ -2911,18 +2911,20 @@ static void intel_read_wm_latency(struct 
> > drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> >             }
> >  
> >             /*
> > -            * WaWmMemoryReadLatency:skl+,glk
> > +            * WaWmMemoryReadLatency
> >              *
> >              * punit doesn't take into account the read latency so we need
> > -            * to add 2us to the various latency levels we retrieve from the
> > -            * punit when level 0 response data us 0us.
> > +            * to add proper adjustement to each valid level we retrieve
> > +            * from the punit when level 0 response data is 0us.
> >              */
> >             if (wm[0] == 0) {
> > -                   wm[0] += 2;
> > +                   u8 adjust = DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 12 ? 3 : 2;
> > +
> > +                   wm[0] += adjust;
> >                     for (level = 1; level <= max_level; level++) {
> >                             if (wm[level] == 0)
> >                                     break;
> > -                           wm[level] += 2;
> > +                           wm[level] += adjust;
> >                     }
> >             }
> >  
> > @@ -2934,7 +2936,6 @@ static void intel_read_wm_latency(struct 
> > drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> >              */
> >             if (dev_priv->dram_info.wm_lv_0_adjust_needed)
> >                     wm[0] += 1;
> > -
> >     } else if (IS_HASWELL(dev_priv) || IS_BROADWELL(dev_priv)) {
> >             u64 sskpd = intel_uncore_read64(uncore, MCH_SSKPD);
> >  
> > -- 
> > 2.31.1
> > 
> 
> -- 
> Matt Roper
> Graphics Software Engineer
> VTT-OSGC Platform Enablement
> Intel Corporation
> (916) 356-2795

-- 
Matt Roper
Graphics Software Engineer
VTT-OSGC Platform Enablement
Intel Corporation
(916) 356-2795
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to