On 03.02.2023 01:11, john.c.harri...@intel.com wrote:
> From: John Harrison <john.c.harri...@intel.com>
>
> Update a bunch more debug prints to use the new GT based scheme.
>
> Signed-off-by: John Harrison <john.c.harri...@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_gsc_fw.c | 8 +++-----
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_gsc_uc.c | 7 +++----
> 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_gsc_fw.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_gsc_fw.c
> index e73d4440c5e82..8e0c736fa4e94 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_gsc_fw.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_gsc_fw.c
> @@ -6,6 +6,7 @@
> #include "gt/intel_engine_pm.h"
> #include "gt/intel_gpu_commands.h"
> #include "gt/intel_gt.h"
> +#include "gt/intel_gt_print.h"
> #include "gt/intel_ring.h"
> #include "intel_gsc_fw.h"
>
> @@ -88,9 +89,7 @@ static int gsc_fw_load(struct intel_gsc_uc *gsc)
> i915_request_put(rq);
>
> if (err)
> - drm_err(&gsc_uc_to_gt(gsc)->i915->drm,
> - "Request submission for GSC load failed (%d)\n",
> - err);
> + gt_err(gsc_uc_to_gt(gsc), "Request submission for GSC load
> failed (%d)\n", err);
>
> return err;
> }
> @@ -200,8 +199,7 @@ int intel_gsc_uc_fw_upload(struct intel_gsc_uc *gsc)
> /* FW is not fully operational until we enable SW proxy */
> intel_uc_fw_change_status(gsc_fw, INTEL_UC_FIRMWARE_TRANSFERRED);
>
> - drm_info(>->i915->drm, "Loaded GSC firmware %s\n",
> - gsc_fw->file_selected.path);
> + gt_info(gt, "Loaded GSC firmware %s\n", gsc_fw->file_selected.path);
>
> return 0;
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_gsc_uc.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_gsc_uc.c
> index fd21dbd2663be..6e7d5aa4dcf5e 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_gsc_uc.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_gsc_uc.c
> @@ -6,6 +6,7 @@
> #include <linux/types.h>
>
> #include "gt/intel_gt.h"
> +#include "gt/intel_gt_print.h"
> #include "intel_gsc_uc.h"
> #include "intel_gsc_fw.h"
> #include "i915_drv.h"
> @@ -59,7 +60,6 @@ int intel_gsc_uc_init(struct intel_gsc_uc *gsc)
> {
> static struct lock_class_key gsc_lock;
> struct intel_gt *gt = gsc_uc_to_gt(gsc);
> - struct drm_i915_private *i915 = gt->i915;
> struct intel_engine_cs *engine = gt->engine[GSC0];
> struct intel_context *ce;
> struct i915_vma *vma;
> @@ -81,8 +81,7 @@ int intel_gsc_uc_init(struct intel_gsc_uc *gsc)
> I915_GEM_HWS_GSC_ADDR,
> &gsc_lock, "gsc_context");
> if (IS_ERR(ce)) {
> - drm_err(>->i915->drm,
> - "failed to create GSC CS ctx for FW communication\n");
> + gt_err(gt, "failed to create GSC CS ctx for FW
> communication\n");
> err = PTR_ERR(ce);
> goto out_vma;
> }
> @@ -98,7 +97,7 @@ int intel_gsc_uc_init(struct intel_gsc_uc *gsc)
> out_fw:
> intel_uc_fw_fini(&gsc->fw);
> out:
> - i915_probe_error(i915, "failed with %d\n", err);
> + gt_probe_error(gt, "GSC init failed with %d\n", err);
> return err;
> }
>
Acked-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdec...@intel.com>
but with %pe used for printing errors (where applicable) it would look
even better