Calling igt_success() explicitly at the end of subtest body is not needed.
Other calls to igt_success() can be usually avoided by inverting test
result checks.  Optimize the code that now calls igt_success().

Moreover, using more advanced variants of igt_skip() and igt_fail() where
applicable makes the code more compact.  Go for it.

Signed-off-by: Janusz Krzysztofik <janusz.krzyszto...@linux.intel.com>
---
 lib/igt_kmod.c | 14 +++-----------
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/lib/igt_kmod.c b/lib/igt_kmod.c
index 34ddec3fad..1d1cd51170 100644
--- a/lib/igt_kmod.c
+++ b/lib/igt_kmod.c
@@ -814,12 +814,8 @@ static void __igt_kunit(const char *module_name, const 
char *opts)
                if (READ_ONCE(results->head) != NULL) {
                        pthread_mutex_lock(&results->mutex);
 
-                       igt_dynamic(results->head->test_name) {
-                               if (READ_ONCE(results->head->passed))
-                                       igt_success();
-                               else
-                                       igt_fail(IGT_EXIT_FAILURE);
-                       }
+                       igt_dynamic(results->head->test_name)
+                               igt_assert(READ_ONCE(results->head->passed));
 
                        temp = results->head;
                        results->head = results->head->next;
@@ -834,8 +830,7 @@ unload:
 
        igt_ktest_fini(&tst);
 
-       if (skip)
-               igt_skip("Skipping test, as probing KUnit module returned %d", 
skip);
+       igt_skip_on_f(skip, "Skipping test, as probing KUnit module failed\n");
 
        if (fail)
                igt_fail(IGT_EXIT_ABORT);
@@ -844,9 +839,6 @@ unload:
 
        if (ret != 0)
                igt_fail(IGT_EXIT_ABORT);
-
-       if (ret == 0)
-               igt_success();
 }
 
 void igt_kunit(const char *module_name, const char *name, const char *opts)
-- 
2.41.0

Reply via email to