On Fri,  8 Sep 2023 14:32:36 +0200
Janusz Krzysztofik <janusz.krzyszto...@linux.intel.com> wrote:

> Since kmod functions we use for module loading can process module
> dependencies, there is no need to load the "kunit" module explicitly
> before loading a kunit test module.  For the same reason we already don't
> unload the "kunit" module explicitly on cleanup.  Drop the unnecessary
> operation.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Janusz Krzysztofik <janusz.krzyszto...@linux.intel.com>

LGTM.

Acked-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mche...@kernel.org>

> ---
>  lib/igt_kmod.c | 6 ------
>  1 file changed, 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/lib/igt_kmod.c b/lib/igt_kmod.c
> index 97667a896f..faf31afabc 100644
> --- a/lib/igt_kmod.c
> +++ b/lib/igt_kmod.c
> @@ -789,12 +789,6 @@ static void __igt_kunit(const char *module_name, const 
> char *opts)
>               goto unload;
>       }
>  
> -     /* The KUnit module is required for running any KUnit tests */
> -     ret = igt_kmod_load("kunit", NULL);
> -     if (ret) {
> -             skip = ret;
> -             goto unload;
> -     }
>       ret = kmod_module_new_from_name(kmod_ctx(), "kunit", &kunit_kmod);
>       if (ret) {
>               igt_warn("Unable to load KUnit\n");

Reply via email to