On Fri, 2014-02-21 at 13:52 -0300, Paulo Zanoni wrote:
> From: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zan...@intel.com>
>
> Because gen6_gt_force_wake_{get,put} should already be responsible for
> getting/putting runtime PM.
>
> Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zan...@intel.com>Reviewed-by: Imre Deak <imre.d...@intel.com> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c | 2 -- > 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c > index 62d0c0915..2ec7b05 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c > @@ -3597,7 +3597,6 @@ static int i915_forcewake_open(struct inode *inode, > struct file *file) > if (INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen < 6) > return 0; > > - intel_runtime_pm_get(dev_priv); > gen6_gt_force_wake_get(dev_priv, FORCEWAKE_ALL); > > return 0; > @@ -3612,7 +3611,6 @@ static int i915_forcewake_release(struct inode *inode, > struct file *file) > return 0; > > gen6_gt_force_wake_put(dev_priv, FORCEWAKE_ALL); > - intel_runtime_pm_put(dev_priv); > > return 0; > }
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
