On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 11:45 PM, Daniel Vetter <dan...@ffwll.ch> wrote: > I agree that I didn't understand the issue at hand at all, and that > your approach is sound. That leaves us with Chris' concern, I'll reply > directly to Chris' mail to address that. > > My apologies for the massive confusion I've caused here.
I've forgotten to mention: Please add your excellent explanation from above to the commit message which adds the no-runtime-pm forcewake get/put calls. -Daniel -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation +41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
