On Thu, Jan 30, 2025 at 11:14:33PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Thu, 30 Jan 2025, Imre Deak <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 29, 2025 at 04:46:36PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
> >> Move mst_state->pbn_div calculation to intel_dp_mtp_tu_compute_config()
> >> to allow further refactoring.
> >> 
> >> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <[email protected]>
> >> ---
> >>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c | 31 ++++++++++-----------
> >>  1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
> >> 
> >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c 
> >> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c
> >> index ea1b05224c06..8786c8751c82 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c
> >> @@ -216,15 +216,25 @@ int intel_dp_mtp_tu_compute_config(struct intel_dp 
> >> *intel_dp,
> >>  {
> >>    struct intel_display *display = to_intel_display(intel_dp);
> >>    struct drm_atomic_state *state = crtc_state->uapi.state;
> >> +  struct drm_dp_mst_topology_state *mst_state = NULL;
> >>    struct intel_connector *connector =
> >>            to_intel_connector(conn_state->connector);
> >>    const struct drm_display_mode *adjusted_mode =
> >>            &crtc_state->hw.adjusted_mode;
> >> -  fixed20_12 pbn_div;
> >> +  bool is_mst = intel_dp->is_mst;
> >>    int bpp, slots = -EINVAL;
> >>    int dsc_slice_count = 0;
> >>    int max_dpt_bpp;
> >>  
> >> +  if (is_mst) {^
> >> +          mst_state = drm_atomic_get_mst_topology_state(state, 
> >> &intel_dp->mst_mgr);
> >> +          if (IS_ERR(mst_state))
> >> +                  return PTR_ERR(mst_state);
> >> +
> >> +          mst_state->pbn_div = 
> >> drm_dp_get_vc_payload_bw(crtc_state->port_clock,
> >> +                                                        
> >> crtc_state->lane_count);
> >> +  }
> >> +
> >
> > This could've been in the if (intel_dp->is_mst) block, since SST doesn't
> > use pbn_div. In any case the patch is correct:
> 
> Uh, there's the if (is_mst)?

I meant the MST block below, but missed that it's within the loop
through bpps:/ So nvm my comment above.

> > Reviewed-by: Imre Deak <[email protected]>
> >
> >>    if (dsc) {
> >>            if (!intel_dp_supports_fec(intel_dp, connector, crtc_state))
> >>                    return -EINVAL;
> >> @@ -232,9 +242,6 @@ int intel_dp_mtp_tu_compute_config(struct intel_dp 
> >> *intel_dp,
> >>            crtc_state->fec_enable = !intel_dp_is_uhbr(crtc_state);
> >>    }
> >>  
> >> -  pbn_div = drm_dp_get_vc_payload_bw(crtc_state->port_clock,
> >> -                                     crtc_state->lane_count);
> >> -
> >>    max_dpt_bpp = intel_dp_mst_max_dpt_bpp(crtc_state, dsc);
> >>    if (max_bpp > max_dpt_bpp) {
> >>            drm_dbg_kms(display->drm, "Limiting bpp to max DPT bpp (%d -> 
> >> %d)\n",
> >> @@ -270,7 +277,7 @@ int intel_dp_mtp_tu_compute_config(struct intel_dp 
> >> *intel_dp,
> >>                                     link_bpp_x16,
> >>                                     &crtc_state->dp_m_n);
> >>  
> >> -          if (intel_dp->is_mst) {
> >> +          if (is_mst) {
> >>                    int remote_bw_overhead;
> >>                    int remote_tu;
> >>                    fixed20_12 pbn;
> >> @@ -295,7 +302,7 @@ int intel_dp_mtp_tu_compute_config(struct intel_dp 
> >> *intel_dp,
> >>                    pbn.full = 
> >> dfixed_const(intel_dp_mst_calc_pbn(adjusted_mode->crtc_clock,
> >>                                                                  
> >> link_bpp_x16,
> >>                                                                  
> >> remote_bw_overhead));
> >> -                  remote_tu = DIV_ROUND_UP(pbn.full, pbn_div.full);
> >> +                  remote_tu = DIV_ROUND_UP(pbn.full, 
> >> mst_state->pbn_div.full);
> >>  
> >>                    /*
> >>                     * Aligning the TUs ensures that symbols consisting of 
> >> multiple
> >> @@ -313,7 +320,7 @@ int intel_dp_mtp_tu_compute_config(struct intel_dp 
> >> *intel_dp,
> >>                     * allocated for the whole path and the TUs allocated 
> >> for the
> >>                     * first branch device's link also applies here.
> >>                     */
> >> -                  pbn.full = remote_tu * pbn_div.full;
> >> +                  pbn.full = remote_tu * mst_state->pbn_div.full;
> >>  
> >>                    drm_WARN_ON(display->drm, remote_tu < 
> >> crtc_state->dp_m_n.tu);
> >>                    crtc_state->dp_m_n.tu = remote_tu;
> >> @@ -365,16 +372,6 @@ static int mst_stream_find_vcpi_slots_for_bpp(struct 
> >> intel_dp *intel_dp,
> >>                                          struct drm_connector_state 
> >> *conn_state,
> >>                                          int step, bool dsc)
> >>  {
> >> -  struct drm_atomic_state *state = crtc_state->uapi.state;
> >> -  struct drm_dp_mst_topology_state *mst_state;
> >> -
> >> -  mst_state = drm_atomic_get_mst_topology_state(state, 
> >> &intel_dp->mst_mgr);
> >> -  if (IS_ERR(mst_state))
> >> -          return PTR_ERR(mst_state);
> >> -
> >> -  mst_state->pbn_div = drm_dp_get_vc_payload_bw(crtc_state->port_clock,
> >> -                                                crtc_state->lane_count);
> >> -
> >>    return intel_dp_mtp_tu_compute_config(intel_dp, crtc_state, conn_state,
> >>                                          min_bpp, max_bpp, step, dsc);
> >>  }
> >> -- 
> >> 2.39.5
> >> 
> 
> -- 
> Jani Nikula, Intel

Reply via email to