> -----Original Message-----
> From: Intel-xe <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Jouni
> Högander
> Sent: Monday, 17 March 2025 10.19
> To: [email protected]; [email protected]
> Cc: Hogander, Jouni <[email protected]>
> Subject: [PATCH v2 08/11] drm/i915/psr: Add interface to notify PSR of vblank
> enable/disable
> 
> To implement Wa_16025596647 we need to get notification of vblank interrupt
> enable/disable. Add new interface to PSR code for this notification.
> 

Reviewed-by: Mika Kahola <[email protected]>

> Signed-off-by: Jouni Högander <[email protected]>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c | 40 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.h |  2 ++
>  2 files changed, 42 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c
> index baf6a7110a555..afb9faed7784b 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c
> @@ -3820,6 +3820,46 @@ void intel_psr_notify_pipe_change(struct
> intel_atomic_state *state,
>       }
>  }
> 
> +/**
> + * intel_psr_notify_vblank_enable_disable - Notify PSR about
> +enable/disable of vblank
> + * @display: intel display struct
> + * @enable: enable/disable
> + *
> + * This is targeted for underrun on idle PSR HW bug (Wa_16025596647) to
> +apply
> + * remove the workaround when vblank is getting enabled/disabled  */
> +void intel_psr_notify_vblank_enable_disable(struct intel_display *display,
> +                                         bool enable)
> +{
> +     struct intel_encoder *encoder;
> +
> +     for_each_intel_encoder_with_psr(display->drm, encoder) {
> +             struct intel_dp *intel_dp = enc_to_intel_dp(encoder);
> +
> +             mutex_lock(&intel_dp->psr.lock);
> +             if (intel_dp->psr.panel_replay_enabled) {
> +                     mutex_unlock(&intel_dp->psr.lock);
> +                     break;
> +             }
> +
> +             if (intel_dp->psr.enabled)
> +
>       intel_psr_apply_underrun_on_idle_wa_locked(intel_dp);
> +
> +             mutex_unlock(&intel_dp->psr.lock);
> +             return;
> +     }
> +
> +     /*
> +      * NOTE: intel_display_power_set_target_dc_state is used
> +      * only by PSR * code for DC3CO handling. DC3CO target
> +      * state is currently disabled in * PSR code. If DC3CO
> +      * is taken into use we need take that into account here
> +      * as well.
> +      */
> +     intel_display_power_set_target_dc_state(display, enable ?
> DC_STATE_DISABLE :
> +                                             DC_STATE_EN_UPTO_DC6);
> +}
> +
>  static void
>  psr_source_status(struct intel_dp *intel_dp, struct seq_file *m)  { diff 
> --git
> a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.h
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.h
> index bfe368239bc27..a914b7ee3756a 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.h
> @@ -64,6 +64,8 @@ void intel_psr_notify_pipe_change(struct
> intel_atomic_state *state,
>                                 struct intel_crtc *crtc, bool enable);  void
> intel_psr_notify_dc5_dc6(struct intel_display *display);  void
> intel_psr_dc5_dc6_wa_init(struct intel_display *display);
> +void intel_psr_notify_vblank_enable_disable(struct intel_display *display,
> +                                         bool enable);
>  bool intel_psr_link_ok(struct intel_dp *intel_dp);
> 
>  void intel_psr_lock(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state);
> --
> 2.43.0

Reply via email to