> -----Original Message----- > From: Jani Nikula <[email protected]> > Sent: Wednesday, 1 October 2025 12.58 > To: Jadav, Raag <[email protected]> > Cc: Kahola, Mika <[email protected]>; [email protected]; > [email protected]; Deak, Imre > <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 01/39] drm/i915/display: Sanitize > PHY_C20_VDR_CUSTOM_SERDES_RATE/DP_RATE field macros > > On Wed, 01 Oct 2025, Raag Jadav <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 01, 2025 at 11:52:20AM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote: > >> On Wed, 01 Oct 2025, Mika Kahola <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <[email protected]> > >> > >> You need to add your Signed-off-by when sending someone else's patches. > > > > Isn't this only when the submitter has made adjustments to originally > > authored code? > > No. You *always* need to add your Signed-off-by when contributing to the > kernel, regardless of whether you were involved in the > development of the patch, or just handling and transporting the patch. See > (c) in [1].
Thanks Jani for a quick review and comments. I will add those missing signed-off-bys on revision 2 as initial feedback suggests that we need one. Cheers, Mika > > > BR, > Jani. > > > [1] > https://docs.kernel.org/process/submitting-patches.html#developer-s-certificate-of-origin-1-1 > > > -- > Jani Nikula, Intel
