When reading memory latencies for watermark calculations, previous
display releases instructed to apply an adjustment of adding a certain
value (e.g. 6us) to all levels when the level 0's memory latency read
from hardware was zero.

For Xe3p_LPD, the instruction is to always use 6us for level 0 and to
add that value to the other levels.  Add the necessary code in
sanitize_wm_latency() so that WaWmMemoryReadLatency is always applied
for Xe3p_LPD and beyond.

v2:
  - Rebased after addition of prep patch "drm/i915/wm: Reorder
    adjust_wm_latency() for Xe3_LPD" (dropped in v3).
v3:
  - Back to the simpler approach of doing the 'wm[0] = 0' step without
    modifying the rest of the code, and that inside
    sanitize_wm_latency(). (Matt Roper, Ville)

Bspec: 68986, 69126
Cc: Matt Atwood <[email protected]>
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Matt Roper <[email protected]>
Link: 
https://patch.msgid.link/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Gustavo Sousa <[email protected]>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_watermark.c | 7 +++++++
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_watermark.c 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_watermark.c
index c888b0896d89..95941e878bf1 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_watermark.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_watermark.c
@@ -3184,6 +3184,13 @@ static void sanitize_wm_latency(struct intel_display 
*display)
        u16 *wm = display->wm.skl_latency;
        int level, num_levels = display->wm.num_levels;
 
+       /*
+        * Xe3p and beyond should ignore level 0's reported latency and
+        * always apply WaWmMemoryReadLatency logic.
+        */
+       if (DISPLAY_VER(display) >= 35)
+               wm[0] = 0;
+
        /*
         * If a level n (n > 1) has a 0us latency, all levels m (m >= n)
         * need to be disabled. We make sure to sanitize the values out
-- 
2.51.0

Reply via email to