On 2026-01-21 13:59:38 [+0530], Borah, Chaitanya Kumar wrote:
>
> Looks like it.
> 9: 1 0 IO-APIC 9-fasteoi acpi, INT0002
Does the following help?
diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/intel/int0002_vgpio.c
b/drivers/platform/x86/intel/int0002_vgpio.c
index 6f5629dc3f8db..562e880256436 100644
--- a/drivers/platform/x86/intel/int0002_vgpio.c
+++ b/drivers/platform/x86/intel/int0002_vgpio.c
@@ -206,8 +206,8 @@ static int int0002_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
* FIXME: augment this if we managed to pull handling of shared
* IRQs into gpiolib.
*/
- ret = devm_request_irq(dev, irq, int0002_irq,
- IRQF_ONESHOT | IRQF_SHARED, "INT0002", chip);
+ ret = devm_request_irq(dev, irq, int0002_irq, IRQF_SHARED, "INT0002",
+ chip);
if (ret) {
dev_err(dev, "Error requesting IRQ %d: %d\n", irq, ret);
return ret;
diff --git a/include/linux/interrupt.h b/include/linux/interrupt.h
index 266f2b39213a0..b2bb878abd113 100644
--- a/include/linux/interrupt.h
+++ b/include/linux/interrupt.h
@@ -228,7 +228,7 @@ static inline int __must_check
devm_request_irq(struct device *dev, unsigned int irq, irq_handler_t handler,
unsigned long irqflags, const char *devname, void *dev_id)
{
- return devm_request_threaded_irq(dev, irq, handler, NULL, irqflags,
+ return devm_request_threaded_irq(dev, irq, handler, NULL, irqflags |
IRQF_COND_ONESHOT,
devname, dev_id);
}
My guess would be that the int0002_vgpio.c results in a warning without
requesting the interrupt while the interrupt.h change should fix it and
the warning should be gone.
> ==
> Chaitanya
Sebastian
