On 1/21/2026 2:31 PM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
On 2026-01-21 13:59:38 [+0530], Borah, Chaitanya Kumar wrote:
Looks like it.
9: 1 0 IO-APIC 9-fasteoi acpi, INT0002
Does the following help?
diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/intel/int0002_vgpio.c
b/drivers/platform/x86/intel/int0002_vgpio.c
index 6f5629dc3f8db..562e880256436 100644
--- a/drivers/platform/x86/intel/int0002_vgpio.c
+++ b/drivers/platform/x86/intel/int0002_vgpio.c
@@ -206,8 +206,8 @@ static int int0002_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
* FIXME: augment this if we managed to pull handling of shared
* IRQs into gpiolib.
*/
- ret = devm_request_irq(dev, irq, int0002_irq,
- IRQF_ONESHOT | IRQF_SHARED, "INT0002", chip);
+ ret = devm_request_irq(dev, irq, int0002_irq, IRQF_SHARED, "INT0002",
+ chip);
if (ret) {
dev_err(dev, "Error requesting IRQ %d: %d\n", irq, ret);
return ret;
diff --git a/include/linux/interrupt.h b/include/linux/interrupt.h
index 266f2b39213a0..b2bb878abd113 100644
--- a/include/linux/interrupt.h
+++ b/include/linux/interrupt.h
@@ -228,7 +228,7 @@ static inline int __must_check
devm_request_irq(struct device *dev, unsigned int irq, irq_handler_t handler,
unsigned long irqflags, const char *devname, void *dev_id)
{
- return devm_request_threaded_irq(dev, irq, handler, NULL, irqflags,
+ return devm_request_threaded_irq(dev, irq, handler, NULL, irqflags |
IRQF_COND_ONESHOT,
devname, dev_id);
}
My guess would be that the int0002_vgpio.c results in a warning without
requesting the interrupt while the interrupt.h change should fix it and
the warning should be gone.
This helps. Thank you for the patch. Would you be floating it soon?
==
Chaitanya
